Since we believe God is omnipotent (he did, you know, create the world after all) we need to always remember that nothing is outside God's influence. Suffering and hardship are indeed part of his plan, and can be seen as a blessing. Take Psalm 66 for example, where the Psalmist is thankful for his current situation:
"Praise our God, O peoples,
let the sound of his praise be heard;
he has preserved our lives
and kept our feet from slipping.
For you, O God, tested us;
you refined us like silver.
You brought us into prison
and laid burdens on our backs.
You let men ride over our heads;
we went through fire and water,
but you brought us to a place of abundance." --Psalm 66:8-12. NIV.
The word refinement is somewhat of a Christian Buzz-Word in that it gets tossed around a lot but isn't examined in any depth often. Regardless, this image is powerful as it accurately reflects man as an impure product. Everyone would admit that there are certain things they dislike about their life; choices that they made that they would have made differently. The Psalmist argues here that suffering is God's way of taking regret and turning it into something holy. Our mistakes, through the refining process of suffering, make us into wiser and hopefully more Godly people. Of course this process is not easy; such mistakes can lead to all sorts of economical, physical, and emotional problems which test our faith in God and life itself, but this is how we are "refined." Just as precious metals like silver are refined in heat and fire, so we are refined as Christians through suffering and hardship.
This presents another quandary for the Christian; why doesn't simply teach us the lesson magically through his "Super God Powers" instead of forcing us to go through suffering? On earth, it appears that the Christian denies him or herself many of Earth's pleasures in order to follow God. Why does God choose to make pleasurable things on Earth only to disallow his people from them? I would argue that things seen as pleasure able by civilization are not necessarily inherently pleasurable. Psalm 49 has some words for this regard:
"Do not be overawed when a man grows rich,
when the splendor of his house increases;
for he will take nothing with him when he dies,
his splendor will not descend with him.
Though while he lived he counted himself blessed--
and men praise you when you prosper--
he will join the generation of his fathers,
who will never see the light of life.
A man who has riches without understanding
is like the beasts that perish." Psalm 49: 16-20. NIV.
It may seem a tired cliche, but we as Christians need to remember that our life lies through God and not through the Earth. The greatest joy of accepting Jesus into one's life is the knowledge that said acceptance begets eternal life with God. As we look around at other men accumulating wealth and vicariously great praise from the world around, we can remember that wealth and the praise of man are only valuable within the system that created them. As we watch the economy crumble around us, it has become very palpable that any wealth we hold is totally dependent on many factors we have no control of. Many men choose to gain wealth within an earthly system, and they reap what they sow. Perhaps they are happy for a short time, but are eternally still at the mercy of the system and will undoubtedly receive nothing at the end of their life but death. If we as Christians decide to place our efforts and faith in the system of God, then we will gain his riches, which transcend this earth. These riches may not allow for earthly pleasure, or the praise of man, but it will allow for safety and infinitely greater rewards in the long term.
God creates suffering and forbiddances in order to refine us and teach us to rely on him instead of Earth. As we make choices within an earthly system and fail, God uses the concept of suffering to teach us to rely on him, and thus reap greater rewards than we could possibly imagine. God gives us free will, and blesses us with a teaching method to show us the benefits of relying on him. The challenge for us then is this: Will we be so selfish as to curse God for his wrath, or will we be wise enough to recognize his love in spite of our mistakes?
4 comments:
This is all good and fine, saying that God uses suffering to teach and that the pleasures of world are nothing compared to the pleasures of heaven but what did the people in Noah's time learn from their suffering. What about the folks in Sodom and Gomorrah. And you say god is omnipotent, yet he relies on inbreading? Why not a second, well actually a first, immaculate conception to continue mankind?
-Steve from Sophias
Good to hear from you first of all Steve; hope things are well. As far as your points, the early Old Testament stories are strongly linked to the notion of free will. Sure God could have come in and made everyone worship him, but that would defeat the purpose of free will. Instead he sent in two angels which were threatened with rape and only greeted in a humane fashion by one man (who survived.) There is some trust with these stories that God knows these people would not have been redeemed (we assume that an omnipotent God can see the future) and decided to provide a new world for his people to grow.
I'm not sure how to respond to your other two points since I'm not sure what you're getting at. I don't think inbreeding is relied upon at all and I'm not sure what context you're referring to with the immaculate conception--post Noah, the present, sometime else?
I may be confused, i usually am on most things but i thought Lot and his daughters had sex to repopulate the world. Maybe they got Lot drunk first but i think God put them in a situation where incest was forced upon them to keep mankind going. My thought was why not have a virginal birth like with Mary, Joseph, and Jesus in the new testament. I thought it was especially weird because god had just smote the world for sexual perversions and now the only survivors were now committing, wait for it, sexual perversions. I should say that i haven opened a bible in like 2 years and i was never that studious with it in the first place so im probably misremembering.
Actually they did get him drunk first, since they believed they were the last people on earth and had to repopulate the earth, when in fact there were still people left that lived outside the destroyed cities. The destruction of the cities wasn't a flood type deal--there were people that lived in other parts of the land other than the doomed cities.
Post a Comment